Pedro Cuiça © Sitting Buffalo Mountain (Banff – Canadá, 2022) |
Humans are animals and like animals we leave tracks as we walk: signs of passage made in snow, sand, mud, grass, dew, earth or moss. The language of hunting has a luminous word for such mark making: ‘foil’. A creature’s ‘foil’ is its track. We easily forget that we are track-makers, though, because most of our journeys now occur on asphalt and concrete – and these are substances not easily impressed.
‘Always, everywhere, people have walked, veining the earth with paths
visible and invisible, symmetrical or meandering,’ writes Thomas Clark in his
enduring prose-poem ‘In Praise of Walking’. It’s true that, once you begin to
notice them, you see that the landscape is still webbed with paths and
footways – shadowing the modern-day road network, or meeting it at a slant or
perpendicular. Pilgrim paths, green roads, drove roads, corpse roads, trods,
leys, dykes, drongs, sarns, snickets – say the names of paths out loud and at
speed and they become a poem or rite – holloways, bostles, shuts, drifways,
lichways, ridings, halterpaths, cartways, carneys, causeways, herepaths.
(p. 13)
The way-marking of old paths is an esoteric lore of its own, involving
cairns, grey wethers, sarsens, hoarstones, longstones, milestones, cromlechs
and other guide-signs. On boggy areas of Dartmoor, fragments of white china
clay were placed to show safe paths at twilight, like Hansel and Gretel’s
pebble trail. In mountain country, boulders often indicate fording points over
rivers: Utsi’s Stone in the Cairngorms, for instance, which marks where the
Allt Mor burn can be crossed to reach traditional grazing grounds, and onto
which has been deftly incised the petroglyph of a reindeer that, when evening
sunlight plays over the rock, seems to leap to life.
(p. 15)
Footpaths are mundane in the best sense of the word: ‘worldly’, open to
all. As rights of way determined and sustained by use, they constitute a
labyrinth of liberty, a slender network of common land that still threads
through our aggressively privatized world of barbed wire and gates, CCTV
cameras and ‘No Trespassing’ signs. It is one of the significant differences
between land use in Britain and in America that this labyrinth should exist.
Americans have long envied the British system of footpaths and the freedoms it
offers, as I in turn envy the Scandinavian customary right of Allemansrätten
(‘Everyman’s right’).
(p. 16)
Paths are the habits of a landscape. They are acts of consensual making.
It’s hard to create a footpath on your own. (…) They relate places in a literal
sense, and by extension they relate people.
Paths are consensual, too, because without common care and common practice
they disappear: overgrown by vegetation, ploughed up or built over (through
they may persist in the memorious substance of land law). Like sea channels
that require regular dredging to stay open, paths need walking.
(…) By no means all interesting paths are old paths. In every town and
city, cutting across parks and waste ground, you’ll see unofficial paths created
by walkers who have abandoned the pavements and roads to take short cuts and
make asides. Town planners call these improvised routes ‘desire lines’ or ‘desire
paths’.
(p. 17)
LIVRO
Macfarlane, Robert. 2012. The Old Ways – A journey on Foot.
London: Penguin Books.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário