© Pedro Cuiça |
HUMANS OF THE Stone Age were
masters at orienting themselves in unfamiliar landscapes, reading the terrain,
and finding their way forward. Their chosen path may not have been the shortest
distance, nor the most expedient, but it was the path of least resistance.
This trait characterized paths back then, and it continues to characterize them
now. A route that follows the path of least resistance through uncharted
territory is intuitively understood because it taps into an instinct that is
deeply ingrained in all of us.
Paths formed because
those who walked left behind footprints in the dirt as they traveled. Others
who followed left new footprints on top of the old ones, ensuring the original
tracks were not wiped out by natural phenomena before someone else passed the
same way.
The path originated for
itself. It was not a scenic route through landscape designed as a promenade or
showcase for breathtaking vistas. It was not planned. There were no preliminary reports,
no feasibility studies, no prior thought given to grading or paving.
The path is an effect,
not the cause. It is organic and biodegradable, conforms to the landscape, is a
part of the very natural world it passes through. It is temporary; its use and
its existence are interdependent. It is there because someone uses it and it is
used because it is there. To maintain a path is to walk it.
[EKELUND, 2020: 26]
© Pedro Cuiça |
LIVRO
EKELUND, Torbjørn. 2020. In Praise of Paths – Walking through time and
nature. Vancouver: Greystone Books.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário